TRENDING
Lagos demolishes illegal structures under high-tension lines • Benue varsity student hospitalised after cousin allegedly pours hot pepper mixture on her • Djokovic: I Am Prepared For US Open • Transfer: Alvarez expected at Atletico training as Arsenal await final decision • 2026 Ballon d’Or: Mourinho names Real Madrid player that deserves award • كرت WTO: كيف تحول ملف السودان من رافعة إصلاح إلى أداة مناورة؟ • Awoniyi Disappointed With Coventry Defeat To Hull City • Brewers' Chourio joins elite club after 20-HR year • Ododo provides N29.8m to 1,490 NYSC deployed to Kogi • Justice at UNIZIK: The speed the silence and the human cost • ECOWAS platform: Group launches ‘checkbeforeyoupost’ to save youths from clutches of cyberbullying laws • Ogoni at crossroads again as oil resumption begins to tear the leaders apart • Kogi House of Assembly advances bill against terrorists, persons with criminal intentions • EXCLUSIVE: Fake Agency Scandal: How Adeyemi allegedly funded PFIPC – ICPC • Drug dollar: Why illicit business persists, cartels grow despite govt’s onslaught • BD Sunday 30th Aug 2026 • Stanbic IBTC marks 12 years of Together4ALimb with 250 children supported • Maltina marks 50 years in Nigeria, highlights changing consumer lifestyles • Reform without relief: Tinubu’s 2027 bid under threat as hardship fuels populism • THE TRAIL...: Of the richest teacher in the country and supplier of police uniforms • Lagos demolishes illegal structures under high-tension lines • Benue varsity student hospitalised after cousin allegedly pours hot pepper mixture on her • Djokovic: I Am Prepared For US Open • Transfer: Alvarez expected at Atletico training as Arsenal await final decision • 2026 Ballon d’Or: Mourinho names Real Madrid player that deserves award • كرت WTO: كيف تحول ملف السودان من رافعة إصلاح إلى أداة مناورة؟ • Awoniyi Disappointed With Coventry Defeat To Hull City • Brewers' Chourio joins elite club after 20-HR year • Ododo provides N29.8m to 1,490 NYSC deployed to Kogi • Justice at UNIZIK: The speed the silence and the human cost • ECOWAS platform: Group launches ‘checkbeforeyoupost’ to save youths from clutches of cyberbullying laws • Ogoni at crossroads again as oil resumption begins to tear the leaders apart • Kogi House of Assembly advances bill against terrorists, persons with criminal intentions • EXCLUSIVE: Fake Agency Scandal: How Adeyemi allegedly funded PFIPC – ICPC • Drug dollar: Why illicit business persists, cartels grow despite govt’s onslaught • BD Sunday 30th Aug 2026 • Stanbic IBTC marks 12 years of Together4ALimb with 250 children supported • Maltina marks 50 years in Nigeria, highlights changing consumer lifestyles • Reform without relief: Tinubu’s 2027 bid under threat as hardship fuels populism • THE TRAIL...: Of the richest teacher in the country and supplier of police uniforms
Alleged Drug Trafficking: Tinubu to block release of records in US court —Legal team
Back to Home

Alleged Drug Trafficking: Tinubu to block release of records in US court —Legal team

Vanguard Nigeria about 3 hours 4 mins read

By Olayinka Ajayi

President Bola Tinubu has filed a challenge in a US court to prevent the Department of Justice, FBI and DEA from releasing records linked to allegations of drug trafficking.

16-page court documents shared by his legal team, Christopher W. Carmichael, Victor P. Henderson, and Oluwole O. Afolabi, according to Channels Television yesterday, argued that the release of the records could infringe on his privacy.

“Submission in that proceeding did not reveal the details of a possible criminal investigation (or its results) involving Intervenor. Other than by speculation or labels, Plaintiff does not point to an existing public record that contains details of a governmental criminal investigation or findings about Intervenor. (DE 85-3, No. 16.)”, one of the documents said. 

“The purpose of Plaintiff’s motion is to obtain such information because it is not public. Moreover, Plaintiff’s argument that the limited disclosures in connection with the forfeiture negates all privacy interests is not consistent with precedent. The Supreme Court explained that an individual retains a privacy interest in an entire file or document being produced, even where there are ‘scattered’ disclosures of information from that same file. See Reporters Committee, 489 U.S. at 764-67 (“our cases have recognized the privacy interests inherent in the non-disclosure of certain information even where the information may have been public at one time.).

“While some information may appear in portions of public records, an individual still retains a privacy interest in the details that remain undisclosed. Applying the Reporter’s Committee, this Court explained that an individual retains a privacy interest even if they were previously publicly associated with criminal activity. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Dept. of Justice, 898 F.Supp.2d 93, 104-05 (D.D.C. 2012).

“Other decisions have likewise described the fact someone was under investigation as ‘distinct’ from the contents of the investigative files. See Electronic Privacy Info. Center v. United States Dept. of Justice, 18 F.4d 712, 719 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (‘Although the names of – 6 – Case 1:23-cv-01816-BAH Document 98 Filed 08/28/26 Page 7 of 16 Trump campaign officials appear in public portions of the Report, they retain a privacy interest in ‘avoiding disclosure of the details of the investigation.’)

“Regardless of the prior disclosure in the forfeiture proceeding, Intervenor retains a privacy interest in potential disclosure of the investigative files sought by Plaintiff.

“Plaintiff’s motion critiques the FBI’s search efforts, the DEA’s Vaughn Index, segregability, document specific withholdings, and the applicability of exemptions to deceased individuals and confidential sources. All of Plaintiff’s other critiques should be viewed in the context of Plaintiff’s overarching goal.

“Plaintiff’s filings, overwhelmingly, demonstrate that his singular focus is obtaining documents with Intervenor’s “name on them.” (See supra pgs. 1-3, 10, and 11.) Any other issues should – 14 – Case 1:23-cv-01816-BAH Document 98 Filed 08/28/26 Page 15 of 16 not allow Plaintiff to access documents that should otherwise be withheld or redacted under Exemption 7(C) or the Privacy Act.

“If this Court finds that Plaintiff cannot use FOIA to mine information in government files about a private individual, he should not be able to access documents with Intervenor’s name on them.

“For all the foregoing reasons, Intervenor requests that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and allow the redactions or withholdings made by the FBI and DEA to stand”.

The president’s records are being sought by American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan, who filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against several US government agencies seeking documents relating to investigations involving Tinubu.

Greenspan’s requests include the FBI’s entire file on Tinubu and FBI Form 302 interview records concerning the period between 1992 and 1993.

The case also involves an alleged record connected to a 1993 civil forfeiture proceeding in the United States involving about $460,000 linked to Tinubu. Tinubu has denied wrongdoing.

The post Alleged Drug Trafficking: Tinubu to block release of records in US court —Legal team appeared first on Vanguard News.

This article was sourced from an external publication.

Share this article
OneClick Africa Logo

Africa's premier digital hub for impactful news, entertainment, and business insights.

© 2026 OneClick Africa. All rights reserved.