TRENDING
Finidi targets NPFL title after CAFCL ticket • Tribute to Chief Reuben Famuyide Fasoranti on his centenary celebration • Zimbabwe name squad for Unity Cup • Bassey Africa’s best defender – Osimhen • The architects of the abyss • What African Consumers Expect Now: Transparency, Sustainability, and Trust • Ground handlers warn airlines’ debt may hit N18bn • Dangote targets $50bn refinery valuation before stock listing • FestMobile targets underserved areas for digital inclusion • Institute advances plan for Africa diplomacy council • Lagos lawmaker distributes N230m cash grants • FG combating medical sector challenges – Pioneer FUMSA VC • Expert decries kidnap victims’ torture, demands security action • Arista targets banks, telcos with energy-efficient technology • Educators demand curriculum reform for inclusive education • Flood alert: Red Cross, EU mobilise prone communities in Bayelsa • Let Anioma, Ijebu, Ogoja, Ibadan and other states be (3), by Eric Teniola • Another roll of the dice for Nigeria’s ailing refineries? • How arrest of 9 kidnappers in Edo revealed insider collaboration • Justice for Mine: Trust issues as Police hide Ogbegbe’s accomplices’ identity • Finidi targets NPFL title after CAFCL ticket • Tribute to Chief Reuben Famuyide Fasoranti on his centenary celebration • Zimbabwe name squad for Unity Cup • Bassey Africa’s best defender – Osimhen • The architects of the abyss • What African Consumers Expect Now: Transparency, Sustainability, and Trust • Ground handlers warn airlines’ debt may hit N18bn • Dangote targets $50bn refinery valuation before stock listing • FestMobile targets underserved areas for digital inclusion • Institute advances plan for Africa diplomacy council • Lagos lawmaker distributes N230m cash grants • FG combating medical sector challenges – Pioneer FUMSA VC • Expert decries kidnap victims’ torture, demands security action • Arista targets banks, telcos with energy-efficient technology • Educators demand curriculum reform for inclusive education • Flood alert: Red Cross, EU mobilise prone communities in Bayelsa • Let Anioma, Ijebu, Ogoja, Ibadan and other states be (3), by Eric Teniola • Another roll of the dice for Nigeria’s ailing refineries? • How arrest of 9 kidnappers in Edo revealed insider collaboration • Justice for Mine: Trust issues as Police hide Ogbegbe’s accomplices’ identity
Dismissed Soldier Drags Army to Court Over Trial
Back to Home

Dismissed Soldier Drags Army to Court Over Trial

This Day about 1 hour 2 mins read

A Lance Corporal in the Nigerian Army, Gwotyel Justine, has approached the Federal High Court in Lagos, challenging what he described as his unlawful dismissal from service, following a controversial military trial.

In the suit marked FHC/L/MISC/620/2026, the soldier alleged serious procedural irregularities and denial of fair hearing during an orderly room trial conducted on April 29, 2025, at the Headquarters of the 9 Brigade in Ikeja, Lagos.

Joined as Defendants in the suit are the Nigerian Army, the Minister of Defence, the Chief of Defence Staff, the Chief of Army Staff, the General Officer Commanding 81 Division, and the Directorate of Army Legal Services.

The application, filed by his Counsel, A. C. Nwokoye, seeks an order of certiorari to quash the proceedings, judgement, and execution of the military trial, which the Applicant claims was fundamentally flawed and contrary to established legal principles.

The Plaintiff is also asking the court to order his reinstatement into the Army, and grant a stay of further actions arising from the judgement pending the determination of the suit.

In an affidavit supporting the application, Justine stated that he was serving with the 192 Battalion (Rear) in Owode Yewa, Ogun State, under the 81 Division, when he was charged with defamation of character and disobedience to particular orders under the Armed Forces Act, leading to his trial and subsequent dismissal. He further alleged that he was denied the opportunity to defend himself or be represented by Counsel, insisting that the trial was marred by bias, lack of proper investigation, absence of records of proceedings, and failure to call material witnesses, all of which he argued violated his constitutional right to fair hearing.

At the resumed hearing on May 4, the court ordered substituted service of hearing notices and adjourned the matter to May 13 for hearing.

This article was sourced from an external publication.

Share this article

Comments (0)

Want to join the discussion?

Sign in to post comments and engage with the community.

Be the first to comment!