An investigator with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mr Christopher Odofin has told the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, that he was not aware of a dispute between the Nigerian Air Force, NAF, and the Federal Aviation Authority of Nigeria, FAAN, over the site of contract awarded to Al Buraq Global Investment Limited at the Katsina airport.
Odofin, who is the 12th prosecution witness, PW12, in the ongoing trial of the immediate past Minister of Aviation, Senator Hadi Abubakar Sirika, and three others, said this on Wednesday while being cross examined by counsel for Al Buraq, Michael Numa SAN.
He said there was no land allocated for the expansion of an apron at the airport.
Sirika is being prosecuted by the EFCC on behalf of the Federal Government, before Justice Sylvanus Oriji, sitting at Maitama, Abuja, alongside his daughter, Fatima and son-in-law, Hamman Jalal Sule, and a company purported owned by the couple, Al Buraq Global Investment Limited, on a six-count charge bordering on abuse of office and contract fraud to the tune of N2.8 billion.
The former minister was alleged to have abused his office as a minister to confer unfair advantage on Al Buraq Global Investment Limited by using his position to influence award of contract for the apron extension for the sum of N1,498,300,750, among other alleged offences.
The alleged offences, according to EFCC, were contrary to the provisions of Sections 12 and 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000, and Section 17(b) of the EFCC (Establishment) Act, 2004, as well as Section 315 of the Penal Code Act, Cap 532 Acts of the FCT and punishable under the same sections.
Sirika and his co-defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge preferred against them by EFCC.
At the resumed trial in the case, the PW12, however confirmed to the court that investigations into the alleged offence were thoroughly conducted, adding that relevant documents were gathered and formed the proof of evidence in the trial.
"To the best of my ability, the investigation was thorough. Also, to the best of my ability, all relevant documents were gathered. All materials submitted to me are in the proof of evidence," Odofin told the court.
Asked if he interviewed officials of Katsina State Ministry of Lands in the course of investigation, the witness answered in the negative, insisting that there was no land for the execution of the project.
He, however, told the court that he would be surprised that the Katsina Ministry of Lands provided land for the execution of the contract and communicated same to EFCC.
The witness further told the court that no NAF personnel and FAAN personnel was interviewed while EFCC was investigating the alleged offence, adding that he did not know if the land in question was being also used by the NAF.
According to him, "We never interviewed personnel of Katsina State Ministry of Lands. We also did not interviewed personnel of Air Force and FAAN.
"I do know if the land is being used by the Air Force. I am not aware that Air Force sent a document on that to EFCC."
Asked if he knows there is a dispute between NAF and FAAN which prevented Al Buraq to mobilise to site, Odofin told the court he did not know.
He added that he was not aware that the dispute had been resolved and that contract was re-awarded to Al Buraq and the company had been directed to move to site to execute the project.
"I am not aware of a dispute between Air Force and FAAN ove the land. I also do not know that the dispute prevented Al Buraq to move to site. Also, I don't know if the contract was re-awarded to Al Buraq and it was asked to move to site," the PW told the court.
While alleging that the former minister influenced the award of the contract, the PW12 informed the court that the then Permanent Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Aviation, Mr Abel Enitan; Director of Procurement of the ministry, Musa Odiniya and Azubuike Okorie, who testified as first prosecution witness (PW1) were interviewed by in the course of investigation though there was no video recording of their statement takings.
Despite being shown documents before the court, the witness insisted that the contracts for terminal building and expansion of apron at the Katsina airport were one but confirmed that the Bureau for Public Procurement gave approval for the contracts.
He then informed the court that the Ministry of Aviation had no affiliations with both the second and third defendants in the case, Fatima Hadi Sirika and Hamman Jalal Sule.
He further told the court that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority the couple respectively worked did not have any authority over the Aviation Ministry.
He confirmed to the court that though Al Buraq had other shareholders and directors, apart from the second and third defendants, none of such were being prosecuted in court.
Meanwhile, Justice Oriji has adjourned the case to November 18 for continuation of cross examination of the PW12.
EFCC investigator claims unaware of NAF, FAAN dispute over Katsina airport project site