Nigeria’s Oil Benchmark Tops $95 Amid Escalating Middle East Conflict

• Attack a ship, get one bridge bombed, Trump tells Iran

Emmanuel Addeh in Abuja

The price of oil yesterday breached the $95 a barrel mark for the first time in six weeks as the escalating Middle East conflict threatened further disruption to global supplies.

Nigeria’s oil benchmark  rose sharply on as renewed US-Iran aggression over the strait of Hormuz was compounded by Houthi threats to target vessels carrying Saudi oil through the Bab el-Mandeb strait.

Brent crude peaked at $126 a barrel in April during the conflict but had eased to as low as $71 at the start of July. The price has shot up again as the war has reignited in recent days, reaching $95.24 on yesterday before easing to $94.40 by the afternoon, up more than 3 per cent on the previous day.

As expected, the skyrocketing international crude prices are also affecting the pump price of fuel in Nigeria , especially in Abuja where petrol rates per litre have risen from around N1,155 to N1,350.

But the global oil price increase followed an 11th night of strikes on Iran, including on aircraft hangars and drone storage sites, despite diplomatic efforts to salvage an interim ceasefire deal. Donald Trump said strikes would intensify in a war that has so far cost the $37.5 billion (£28 billion).

The jump in crude prices this month has marked the fastest increase since the US-Israeli attacks on Tehran first disrupted flows of Gulf exports via Hormuz in March, a UK Guardian stated.

It also threatens to put the market on track for oil prices of $120 a barrel by the end of the year unless exports via Hormuz restart, according to analysts at Goldman Sachs.

The head of the world’s energy watchdog, Fatih Birol, said on Tuesday that global oil markets had so far benefited from “cushioning factors” but there was no room for complacency amid the escalation in hostilities.

The factors included the release of about 400m barrels of emergency oil and oil products held by International Energy Agency (IEA) members and the efforts of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to continue exporting crude via alternative routes.

In addition, oil-producing countries have increased their exports, while oil-hungry countries including China, the world’s biggest importer, have cut their purchases from the global oil market.

These factors have helped to keep oil prices from reaching the highs first feared at the start of the conflict, which led to what the IEA has described as the greatest ever supply disruption to the market.

The slowdown in oil buying has meant many of the world’s refineries have cut their production, leading to supply concerns for fuels and chemicals. Even as Gulf crude exports increased during the ill-fated US-Iran ceasefire, the production of road fuels has remained weak, according to Birol.

“Refinery activity and product supplies have not picked up as much as crude deliveries, meaning that markets for refined oil products, including diesel and gasoline, are considerably tighter than those for crude,” he said.

While an increase in gas exports from the US and Canada helped to offset about 70 per cent of the lost Gulf gas supply via the strait of Hormuz, availability is expected to remain tight in the run-up to winter as European buyers attempt to refill depleted gas storage facilities, Birol said.

He added that a “resolution to the ongoing conflict that includes a full and unconditional reopening of the strait of Hormuz” was essential to avoid “a further deterioration in global energy security”.

Trump threatened on Wednesday to destroy a bridge or power plant each time Iran shoots at a ship in the strait of Hormuz.

With negotiations largely stalled, both sides have sought leverage by targeting civilian infrastructure. Iran has responded to US attacks by targeting energy infrastructure and desalination plants that provide drinking water in neighbouring Gulf countries.

International law generally prohibits such attacks unless the infrastructure is being used for military purposes. The UN Secretary General, António Guterres, described them as unacceptable on Tuesday, the Guardian report said.