By Enitan Abdultawab
The absence of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology in the Africa Cup of Nations, AFCON qualifiers has come under scrutiny following Ghana’s 2 0 defeat to Côte d’Ivoire in Bouaké on Thursday.
Ghana coach Carlos Queiroz was particularly unhappy with the decision that led to Côte d’Ivoire’s second goal, after referee Mustapha Ghorbal awarded the hosts a penalty for Abdul Fatawu Issahaku’s challenge on Malick Yalcouyé.
Franck Kessié converted the spot kick to extend Côte d’Ivoire’s lead, but the decision became a major talking point after the match. Queiroz, after watching television replays, described the penalty call as “a joke”.
In addition, football fans think Magadascar’s first goal against Nigeria could have gone under a check if VAR existed, although further replays showed that Ehsan Kari was indeed not offside.
Hence, these controversies have raised questions about why these incidents could not be reviewed with VAR.
Why VAR is absent in AFCON qualifiers
The absence of the technology from AFCON qualifying matches is not simply a matter of choosing not to use it. VAR requires substantial technical and operational arrangements before it can be deployed at a match.
A stadium must have suitable camera systems, communication infrastructure, trained VAR officials and other technical facilities capable of supporting the review process. These requirements can be difficult to guarantee across all the venues used for a continental qualifying competition.
Unlike the AFCON finals, which are played at a limited number of selected stadiums, the qualifiers involve teams from all 54 CAF member associations and are staged at venues with varying levels of infrastructure.
The Stade de la Paix in Bouaké, where Ghana faced Côte d’Ivoire, is capable of supporting VAR. The stadium hosted matches during the 2023 Africa Cup of Nations, where VAR was deployed throughout the tournament.
The bigger challenge is ensuring that the same standard can be maintained across the entire qualifying competition.
CAF’s stadium regulations provide different requirements for different competitions, meaning venues used for qualifiers do not necessarily have to meet all the standards required for the AFCON final tournament.
In cases where a country does not have a stadium approved for a particular competition, CAF can require its home matches to be played at another approved venue, including one outside the country.
The situation makes the wider use of VAR during qualifiers a question of consistency as much as technology.
If VAR were available at one qualifying venue but could not be operated at another, teams could face different officiating conditions depending on where their matches are played.
For CAF to introduce VAR across the AFCON qualifiers, the technology would therefore have to be supported by the necessary infrastructure, personnel and operational arrangements at venues throughout the competition.
Ultimately, the bottom line is that the use cannot be consistent as not all countries possess the infrastructure to use it. Therefore, CAF cannot afford that some stadia use VAR while some do not.
The post Why VAR is not used in AFCON qualifiers appeared first on Vanguard News.